Search
Hedge Fund News

EH Report

Awards

Private Equity Daily

Conferences

Fund Launches and Closures

Career Centre

Archive

FAQ






Hedge Fund Monthly
 
Overcoming the Capital Challenge

Piers Alexander, Partner
Conyers Dill & Pearman (Hong Kong)

January 2010
 

The lower levels of leverage both of the hedge funds themselves and their investors, coupled with the willingness of Asia hedge funds to meet redemption requests, recognising that suffering a reduction in assets under management would go towards preserving the future relationship with cash-hungry investors, has meant that the level of hedge fund restructurings in Asia may have been less than in other parts of the world.

However, the desire among investors for cash liquidity continues to affect the capital raising capabilities of Asian hedge funds. Borne out of the forced redemptions from funds of all types in 2008 to 2009 and reflective of the credit issues faced by investors in the financial crisis, this desire remains a pressure on hedge funds. In addition, some recent investment flows would be characterised as “hot money” investment decisions, not necessarily an approach, which sits well with the investment timeline horizons required by many Asian hedge funds or their investors.

A New Breed of Tools

A corollary of the financial crisis has been the damage suffered to the credibility of some of the traditional tools previously employed by hedge funds to keep investors invested.

However, the investors’ reaction to the employment of such tools may offer some useful pointers to new hedge funds seeking to raise capital in Asia. Indeed, the changing tastes and tolerances of investors have had an effect on the structuring of hedge funds.

For example, redemption gates were originally intended to prevent forced sales of investments in order to meet redemption requests and also to prevent the subsequent overweighting of the remaining unsold portfolio towards less liquid investments. The imposition of redemption gates, however, has caused objections by investors where seemingly used as a defensive weapon by investment managers seeking to prolong the life of the funds rather than to enable the orderly sale at what the relevant manager regarded as appropriate prices.

Please Login to read the rest of the article

Not a subscriber? Click here to register for the FREE news articles

For further information on Eurekahedge online products, please contact our sales staff for a FREE demonstration:

Eurekahedge Research Data
Sales Line: +65 6212 0925
US: 1866 578 4852
UK: 0800 404 8106
sales@eurekahedge.com

If you have any comments about or contributions to make to this newsletter, please email editor@eurekahedge.com

[Top]

 
Industry News
 
     
  The Eurekahedge Report  
    
  July 2010 Asset Flows Update  
     
  July 2010 Hedge Fund Performance Commentary  
     
  2010 Key Trends in Global Hedge Funds  
     
  Interview with Steve Gilboy, Michael Newlander and Jason Gilboy of GLL Investors  
     
  After the Mulligan – An Asian Hedge Fund Perspective  
     
  Hedge Funds: A Risk Manager’s Viewpoint  
     
 Where to Start: Managed Accounts or Hedge Fund?  
     
 Aligning Interests  
     
 Private Equity Tax Becomes More Onerous  
     
 Risk Sharing and Islamic Finance  
     
 Socially Responsible Investments Earning Their Keep
     
  Why Invest Ethically?  
     
     
     
    
     
     
     
     






eurex

custom_house
space
Copyright © 2010 Eurekahedge Pte Ltd.
Use of this site is subject to our terms and conditions of use.