|
It has been a general perception that offshore
funds making profits in Hong Kong are not taxed
in Hong Kong or the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department
("IRD") will not seek to tax the offshore
funds. This perception is not entirely wrong.
Funds authorised by Hong Kong Securities and Futures
Commission ("SFC") and certain unauthorised
funds which are "bona fide widely held"
and subject to a supervisory authority in an "acceptable
regulatory regime" are exempt from Hong Kong
profits tax on their profits made in Hong Kong.
Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands and, ironically,
Hong Kong are not in the list of "acceptable
regulatory regime". In reality, many other
offshore funds making profits in Hong Kong were
not paying profits tax in Hong Kong. This is not
because they were exempt from profits tax in Hong
Kong but may be due to the fact that the IRD was
not aware of the extent of activities carried
out by the offshore funds in Hong Kong and was
probably short of resources to probe into their
activities in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, however, does
not levy tax on profits sourced outside Hong Kong
and on capital gains.
There is always a risk that unauthorised offshore
fund may be subject to profits tax in Hong Kong
(currently at 17.5%) if it is considered to be
carrying on a business in Hong Kong and the "Hong
Kong source profits" was derived from such
business in Hong Kong. "Offshore fund(s)"
hereinafter mentioned refers to unauthorised offshore
fund(s). The Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance
("IRO") does not define what is and
what is not sourced in Hong Kong. It is, however,
clear from case law that profit from trading in
shares listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange
is sourced in Hong Kong. An offshore fund may
be regarded as carrying on business in Hong Kong
by itself or through a discretionary agent which
constitutes a permanent establishment in Hong
Kong. This would arise where the offshore fund
has a Hong Kong investment manager with full discretionary
power to negotiate and conclude contracts on behalf
of it in Hong Kong. Obviously, there is a difference
in the way the Hong Kong tax legislation should
be interpreted and the way the fund industry reckons
on the Hong Kong profits tax position of the offshore
funds.
The "tax uncertainty" issue facing
by the offshore funds was publicly addressed by
the Hong Kong Financial Secretary in his budget
speech in early 2003. The then Financial Secretary
said that the Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region ("Government")
intended to amend the tax legislation to exempt
offshore funds from Hong Kong profits tax. Two
rounds of consultation on the different approaches
for effecting the proposal of providing profits
tax exemption for offshore funds with the fund
industry, interest parties and the public were
conducted in early 2004 and early 2005.
The consultation paper of January 2004 proposed
to effect the exemption and the anti-avoidance
measure by granting exemption only to a non-resident
person (including a corporation, a trustee of
a trust estate or a partnership) which is mainly
owned by non-resident beneficial owners. In the
consultation paper, the exemption threshold of
non-resident interest was set at 80% or above,
ie, the exemption would not apply if the aggregate
beneficial interests in the non-resident person
held by non-resident investors are less than 80%.
In response to the consultation paper, the fund
industry and other interest parties raised much
concerns about the practicality of such an approach
proposed.
A revised approach was proposed in the second
consultation paper of December 2004. The fund
industry and other interest parties generally
expressed support to the revised approach and
the revised approach became the blueprint for
the Revenue (Profits Tax Exemption for Offshore
Funds) Bill 2005 (the "Bill") of June
2005.
The Revenue (Profits Tax Exemption for Offshore
Funds) Bill 2005 (the "Bill")
The Bill proposed to introduce five new sections
and a new Schedule into the IRO. The key provisions
are as follows:
- Exemption Provisions
Exemption from Hong Kong profits tax will be
granted to non-resident persons (including natural
persons, corporations, trustees and partnerships)
in respect of certain profits from dealing in
securities, dealing in futures contracts and
leveraged foreign exchange trading ("exempt
transactions") in any year of assessment
commencing on or after 1 April 1996 (ie giving
retrospective effect). These activities must
be carried out through certain specific types
of SFC licensed "specified persons"
and the non-resident must not carry on any other
business in Hong Kong. Income from transactions
which are "incidental" to the carrying
out of the exempt transactions will also be
exempt from tax provided such income does not
exceed 5% of the total trading receipts earned
by the non-resident from the exempt and incidental
transactions in Hong Kong.
- Losses from Exempt Transactions
Losses sustained by a non-resident person from
exempt transactions in a year of assessment
will not be available for set off against assessable
profits for tax purposes.
- Deeming Provisions
The Deeming Provisions provide that (i) a resident
person who, together with his associates, holds
a direct or indirect interest of 30% or more
in an exempt non-resident person or (ii) a resident
person who, together with his associates, holds
any interest, direct or indirect, in an associated
exempt non-resident person will be subject to
Hong Kong profits tax on its share of the non-resident's
exempt profits. The purpose of the Deeming Provisions
is to avoid abuse of the Exemption Provisions
by Hong Kong residents and they will apply from
the date of enactment of the Bill. The Deeming
Provisions will not apply however in cases where
the beneficial interest in the non-resident
is regarded by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue
as "bona fide widely held".
Major concerns made by the deputations from the
fund industry and interest parties on the Bill
include: (1) the interpretation of the concept
"central management and control" for
non-resident persons, (2) the scope of transactions
exempt from Hong Kong profits tax, and (3) the
impact of the "Deeming Provisions" on
Hong Kong investment managers/advisors. After
extensive discussions and listening to the presentations
made by deputations from the investment industry
and interest parties, the Government proposed
a number of amendments to the Bill (hereinafter
refers to as the Revised Bill) in late November
2005. The amendments are overall in line with
the industry's expectations and the industry and
interest parties indicated that they give full
support to the Revised Bill.
The following discuss the salient features of
the Bill and the Revised Bill.
- Non-Resident Persons and Central Management
and Control
The first condition for an offshore fund in
getting Hong Kong profits tax exemption is to
ensure that it is a non-resident person of Hong
Kong. The scope of non-resident persons in the
Bill is wider than that proposed in the consultation
paper of January 2004 which did not include
individuals. The Bill provides that an individual
is a Hong Kong resident if he or she ordinarily
resides in Hong Kong or stays in Hong Kong for
more than 180 days in a year of assessment (from
1 April to 30 March of the following year) or
300 days in two consecutive years of assessment.
The Bill further provides that a non-individual
entity is a Hong Kong resident if its central
management and control is exercised in Hong
Kong. The place of incorporation of the fund
itself is not conclusive evidence of offshore
residence. The IRD indicated that they will
look at the substance rather than the form in
ascertaining where the central management and
control of a non-individual entity is located.
The IRD also agreed to issue a Departmental
Interpretation and Practice Notes to explain
and state their view on this issue.
- Transactions Exempt From Hong Kong Profits
Tax
The Bill initially proposed to grant profits
tax exemption to offshore funds for profits
derived from dealing in securities, futures
contracts and leveraged foreign exchange trading
provided that these transactions were carried
out through "specified persons". The
meaning of "securities", referring
to the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Ordinance,
is very restrictive and does not clearly cover
many instruments or products that are typically
invested by funds such as derivatives, warrants,
option, swaps, commodities, private equities
and so on. Furthermore, the scope of proposed
exemption is merely restricted to "securities",
"futures contracts" and "leveraged
foreign exchange trading". Deputations
from the fund industry and the interest parties
were not satisfied with this proposal. After
extensive discussion and consultation with the
fund industry and the interest parties, the
Government decided to develop a new definition
of "securities" for tax exemption
purposes and expand the scope of exempt transactions
in the Revised Bill by adding a new schedule
to the IRO. The Revised Bill also proposed to
give power to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue
to revise the schedule from time to time if
necessary. The scope of exempt transactions
is expanded to six categories in the Revised
Bill, they are:
| (a) |
a transaction
in securities. |
| (b) |
a transaction
in futures contracts. |
| (c) |
a transaction
in foreign exchange contracts. |
| (d) |
a transaction
consisting in the making of a deposit
other than by way of a money-lending business. |
| (e) |
a transaction
in foreign currencies. |
| (f) |
a transaction
in exchange-traded commodities. |
For policy reasons, the Government reiterated
that "securities" does not include
shares or debentures of, or rights, options
or interest in, or in respect of, shares or
debentures of, a company that is a private company
within the meaning of s.29 of the Hong Kong
Companies Ordinance. Hence, profits derived
from trading of these instruments are not tax
exempt. Furthermore, inter alias, profits from
dealing in real estate in Hong Kong are not
tax exempt.
The Bill initially required that the exempt
transactions to be carried out through "specified
persons". In the Bill, "specified
persons" meant a few out of the 9 SFC licences
would qualify. The Revised Bill now allows the
exempt transactions to be carried out through
or arranged by "specified persons".
The Revised Bill also extended the scope of
"specified persons" to cover all 9
SFC licence types' holders and authorised institutions
registered with the SFC. This amendment gives
more flexibility to fund managers in how they
arrange their business in Hong Kong.
- Deeming Provisions
The Deeming Provisions will be invoked when
a Hong Kong resident is associated with a non-resident
person and the Hong Kong resident also directly
or indirectly holds beneficial interests in
that tax exempt non-resident person. A Hong
Kong resident corporation is associated with
a non-resident corporation if the Hong Kong
resident corporation controls the business affairs
of the non-resident corporation or they are
both under the common control of a third person.
The effect of the Deeming Provisions is that
the Hong Kong resident person is required to
report the Hong Kong sourced profits earned
by the non-resident person attributable to him/her/it
in his/her/its tax return in Hong Kong regardless
of whether there is any actual distribution
of profits. In practice, the investment managers,
especially for Cayman Islands incorporated funds,
are required to hold management shares in the
funds. Under this situation, if the investment
manager is a Hong Kong corporation, it will
fall squarely within the Deeming Provisions.
This may increase the tax burden of the Hong
Kong investment manager even if it holds a very
small interest in the offshore fund and may
also discourage fund cum investment manager
to manage the fund in Hong Kong. The Revised
Bill now proposes to carve out the management
shares without participating rights held by
the Hong Kong fund managers from the Deeming
Provisions. This definitely relieves the resident
investment manager from Hong Kong tax burden
in holding the management non-participating
shares in the offshore funds. The Revised Bill
also proposes that the Deeming Provision will
become effective from the year of assessment
immediately following the year of assessment
in which the Bill is enacted. That is to say,
if the Revised Bill is enacted in March 2006,
the Deeming Provision will become effective
in the year of assessment 2006/07 (commencing
on 1 April 2006). If the Revised Bill is enacted
after 1 April 2006, the Deeming Provision will
become effective in the year of assessment 2007/08
(commencing on 1 April 2007).
The Government is expecting the Revised Bill
to become law in the first quarter of 2006. It
is very likely that the Revised Bill will be enacted
in its present form. Offshore funds should now
(not too late though) take necessary steps to
ensure they would satisfy all the exemption conditions.
Although the exemption takes retrospective effect
back to 1 April 1996, offshore funds must satisfy
all the exemption conditions in each year of assessment
from 1996. It is possible for the IRD to scrutinise
the tax positions of the offshore funds if they
carried on business in Hong Kong and earned Hong
Kong sourced profits in back years after the proposed
legislation is enacted into law.
|