|
Outlook for the Asian Credit Market in 2004
We expect the positive macroeconomic background in Asia to
persist in 2004. Our base case is for growth to pick-up in
G3 economies (US, Euroland and Japan), leading to a coordinated
global recovery. Asia will benefit from a pick-up in exports
to these markets. Additionally, growing domestic demand and
stronger inter-regional trade, driven by China, will add further
impetus to growth. Thus we still expect the environment to
be credit friendly in 2004.

The positive macro environment will enable corporates to
continue strengthening their financial profiles. Sovereigns
too will benefit from stronger growth, which should lead to
improving fiscal profiles. Thus, we would expect the positive
rating trend seen in the past three years (see chart) to continue
in to 2004.
Another positive aspect of the Asian credit market is the
healthy and growing supply. Gross issuance of Asian eurobonds
was a record US$30 billion in 2003, up from US$20 billion
in 2002. It is expected that 2004 supply will marginally exceed
that of 2003.
The healthy levels of new issuance help ensure that breadth
is maintained in the market and that market prices are reflective
of credit fundamentals. Among the new supply expected are
first time issuers, which generally offer diversification
benefits and greater relative value. Given the amount of liquidity
in the system, we believe the new supply should be met with
adequate demand.
Another major consideration when assessing the outlook for
Asian credits in 2004 is the political calendar. As detailed
in the following table, eight Asian countries will be holding
elections. While we expect most elections to be held peacefully
and result in minimal economic policy changes, it is always
the unexpected which haunts the market. Elections always contain
room for surprises, which could add to volatility in Asian
credit markets.

Finally, investors in Asian credits will likely have to deal
with rising US Treasury yields. Hence duration management
will become an increasingly important consideration.
Performance of Asian Credit Hedge Fund
The Asian Credit Hedge Fund (ACHF), which was launched in
February 2002, has performed well since inception. The fund
returned 14.1% in the Feb-Dec 2002 period, and 12.5% in 2003.
The following table compares the fund's returns to returns
of JP Morgan's Asian Credit Index (JACI) and Merrill Lynch's
US Treasury Index.
As can be seen, the ACHF has performed well in different
credit and interest rate environments. Another point to note
is ACHF's lower volatility. In the combined 23 months, ACHF's
standard deviation (0.6%) was significantly lower than that
of the JACI and the ML UST index. Similarly ACHF demonstrated
a lower number of down months and a higher Sharpe Ratio -
indicating better risk-adjusted returns.

ACHF's Strategy for 2004
In our opinion, ACHF's multiple-strategies and hedging techniques
are well suited for the above-described environment, where
we are likely to witness rising yields, potentially increased
volatility and more selective spread compression. The following
strategies are expected to enable us to achieve double-digit
returns in 2004 with limited monthly volatility.
A. Core Credit Selection
The core of ACHF's strategy is to long / trade a core portfolio
of credits, which are expected to demonstrate improving credit
fundamentals and/or offer significant relative value opportunities.
This will include a diversified portfolio of bonds, loans,
perpetuals and convertible securities. In addition, the portfolio
will normally include 15-20% in special situation investments,
which are usually characterised by deep discounts and exceptionally
high return potential. The fund is not constrained by currency,
rating, structure or tenor of any investment, as unwanted
risks can be hedged away.
The ability to invest in multiple asset classes improves
the fund's investment options, enables us to seek the best
value, and helps generate returns in different market environments.
For example, yield curves of different currencies do not necessarily
move in tandem. Similarly returns of special situation investments,
convertible bond and high-grade bonds are not necessarily
correlated.
Given our positive macro views, we expect higher-yield and
special situation investments to outperform this year. Hence
these areas will be the focus of our credit portfolios, especially
given that they are less correlated to US Treasury movements.
We also expect convertibles will benefit from stronger equity
markets. Rather than taking outright equity risk we will focus
on balanced convertibles offering yield with some equity upside.
The core credit portfolio, described above, is augmented
by the following strategies aimed at enhancing returns and
reducing volatility.
B. Interest Rate Hedging
ACHF dynamically manages its interest rate exposure through
the use of US Treasury futures, options and swaps. This enables
us to protect the portfolio's returns against adverse movements
in government bond yields.
The fund has a successful track record of managing interest
rate volatility. For example, in 2003, Merrill Lynch's US
Treasury Index recorded a negative return in five months out
of 12 months. By contrast, the fund was able to generate positive
returns in four out of these five months. The only exception
was July 2003, when the Treasury index dropped 4.24%, and
ACHF fell by 0.70%.
C. Credit and Macro-risk Hedging
ACHF also uses credit default swaps to manage overall country
exposures and macro risks. For example, we may have favourable
credit opinions on certain corporate credits in the Philippines,
but we may be cautious on the country's macro-economic and/or
political situation. In this case we may long the corporate
credit and short the sovereign component by buying CDS protection
on the sovereign. Similar strategies are also used to manage
overall net country exposure on a portfolio basis.
The fund also invests in various currency, commodity and
equity options as long-term sleeping hedges against potential
market surprises. These hedges are unlikely to ever come in-to-the
money. However, we believe they offer the portfolio protection
in the event of unexpected situations. We limit the annual
cost these hedges to just about 1% to 1.5% of the fund's NAV.
ACHF's Country Outlook
|
Macro Outlook/ Trend |
Pricing/ Relative Valuation |
Supply/ Demand Balance |
Available Credit Ops. |
Portfolio Weighting |
Net Credit Exposures |
| Japan |
Neutral |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Over Weight |
Short |
| China |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
Under Weight |
Short |
| Hong Kong |
+ |
Neutral |
Neutral |
+ |
Market Weight |
Short |
| Taiwan |
+ |
Neutral |
+ |
- |
Market Weight |
Long |
| India |
+ |
Neutral |
+ |
- |
Market Weight |
Long |
| Indonesia |
Neutral |
+ |
Neutral |
+ |
Market Weight |
Long |
| Korea |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Market Weight |
Short |
| Malaysia |
+ |
Neutral |
+ |
Neutral |
Over Weight |
Long |
| Thailand |
+ |
Neutral |
+ |
Neutral |
Over Weight |
Long |
| Philippines |
Neutral |
+ |
- |
+ |
Market Weight |
Long |
| Singapore |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
Under Weight |
Long |
+: Favourable conditions for spread tightening
-: Unfavourable conditions for spread tightening
|